Claims

The PBL advantage over the conventional method held for modules with more adjectives but not for the noun-heavy modules 3 and 5 on recall

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Post-test differences between groups were significant in modules 1, 2 and 4 but not in modules 3 and 5, which the authors attribute to those modules containing more nouns than adjectives. → Shafaei 2015

Evidence

Shafaei 2015

Shafaei, A., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2015). Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 83-99. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-sample t-tests per module (SPSS 13.0) compared post-test scores; the article reports significance at the 99% level in modules 1, 2 and 4 and non-significance in modules 3 and 5, offering the noun/adjective composition as a possible explanation.

"The t-test reveals that experimental group had a significantly higher post-test score in modules 1, 2 and 4 at a confidence level of 99 % while the difference in post -test scores is not significant in modules 3 and 5. This is perhaps because the stimulus items in modules 3 and 5 comprise more nouns than adjectives."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.