Claims

PBL-taught learners showed significantly higher vocabulary retention on delayed post-tests in all modules except module 3

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher on delayed post-tests administered five weeks after each post-test, except in module 3 where the difference was not statistically significant. → Shafaei 2015

Evidence

Shafaei 2015

Shafaei, A., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2015). Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 83-99. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Delayed post-tests (weeks 7-11) measured retention five weeks after each post-test; delayed post-test means were 26.05 (experimental) vs 21.30 (control), and the article reports significance in all modules except module 3, with no effect size printed.

"Results of the t-test reveal that the experimental group had a significantly higher delayed post-test score in all modules at a confidence level of 99 %, except for module 3 where the difference was not statistically significant."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.