Claims

Students in the PBL statistics class were active at every observed interval, while some conventional-class students engaged in irrelevant activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Observation across three PBL meetings found students performing at least one observed activity category every five minutes, mostly discussing or solving the student worksheet; the control class did not meet the effective category. → Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Evidence

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO, Sugi HARTONO, Ahmad Wachidul KOHAR. (2018). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 75, 197-212. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181463

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Observational data from student activity observation sheets during three PBL meetings, using six activity categories. Most students were in category 3, "discussing or solving the student worksheet". In the conventional class some students did irrelevant activities such as sleeping and playing for as long as 75 minutes.

"Observation of student activity during three meetings at the PBL class shows that during every five minute observation, the student could do at least one category of student activity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.