Claims

Student responses to PBL statistics learning were positive, and more positive than responses to conventional learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 78.02% of students selected positive-category response items after PBL, versus 55% positive responses in conventional learning. → Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Evidence

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO, Sugi HARTONO, Ahmad Wachidul KOHAR. (2018). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 75, 197-212. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181463

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Questionnaire data collected after learning in both classes. The article reports 78.02% positive responses in PBL versus 55% in conventional learning; the discussion separately reports 85.83% of students agreed with all questionnaire statements. No inferential test is reported.

"The result of a questionnaire for student responses to the learning shows that the number of students who selected response items in the positive category is 78.02%. Thus, the student responses are positive. Meanwhile, in conventional learning the student responses are positive but much lower, with only 55% selecting positive responses."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.