Student responses to PBL statistics learning were positive, and more positive than responses to conventional learning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 78.02% of students selected positive-category response items after PBL, versus 55% positive responses in conventional learning. → Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018
Evidence¶
Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018¶
Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO, Sugi HARTONO, Ahmad Wachidul KOHAR. (2018). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 75, 197-212. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181463
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Questionnaire data collected after learning in both classes. The article reports 78.02% positive responses in PBL versus 55% in conventional learning; the discussion separately reports 85.83% of students agreed with all questionnaire statements. No inferential test is reported.
"The result of a questionnaire for student responses to the learning shows that the number of students who selected response items in the positive category is 78.02%. Thus, the student responses are positive. Meanwhile, in conventional learning the student responses are positive but much lower, with only 55% selecting positive responses."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in the PBL statistics class were active at every observed interval, while some conventional-class students engaged in irrelevant activities — related
- PBL is not statistically superior to conventional teaching for problem-solving in first-year students (p = 0.47), with the pooled effect tending toward conventional teaching — related
- In the PBL class all students reached the minimum standard score on statistics outcomes, while fewer than half did in the conventional class — related
- PBL teaching improves problem-solving, independent learning, teamwork, communication and clinical reasoning abilities more than traditional teaching in orthopaedics education — related
- PBL shows no statistically significant advantage over conventional learning for critical thinking/knowledge in first-year medical students (p = 0.29) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.