Claims

Active learning was incorporated in 34 of 35 reviewed effective PD studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Thirty-four of the 35 studies incorporated some element of active learning in the design of the PD. → Darling-Hammond 2017

Evidence

Darling-Hammond 2017

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev. doi:10.54300/122.311

q2 · i? · review · r2

Coding result across the report's 35 reviewed studies. Active learning is described as engaging teachers directly in designing and trying out teaching strategies, using "authentic artifacts, interactive activities" rather than lecture-based formats.

"Overall, 34 of the 35 studies incorporated some element of active learning in the design of the PD, while one study did not provide enough description of the PD model to ascertain whether active learning was present."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pd-active-learning-prevalence
title Active learning was incorporated in 34 of 35 reviewed effective PD studies
description Active learning was incorporated in 34 of 35 reviewed effective PD studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — darling-hammond-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.