Claims

All 35 reviewed studies used models or modeling, and curriculum without PD support yielded worse outcomes than older curriculum with none

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All 35 studies reviewed included curricular models and/or modeling of effective instruction. → Darling-Hammond 2017 q3 i? Students whose teachers used a new science curriculum with PD outperformed those whose teachers used it without PD; students of teachers using the older curriculum without PD also outperformed the new-curriculum-no-PD group. → Darling-Hammond 2017 (2)

Evidence

Darling-Hammond 2017

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev. doi:10.54300/122.311

q2 · i? · review · r2

Coding result across the report's reviewed studies; modeling kinds listed include video or written cases, demonstration lessons, unit or lesson plans, peer observations, and curriculum materials with sample assessments and student work.

"All 35 studies reviewed here included curricular models and/or modeling of effective instruction in the delivery of content and pedagogical learning for teachers."

Darling-Hammond 2017 (2)

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev. doi:10.54300/122.311

q3 · i? · review · r2

Doppelt et al. (2009) study of 8th-grade science teachers using a new electronics curriculum, with content-based collaborative inquiry sessions. The report concludes students were better off if teachers did not attempt new curricular materials without effective PD supporting them.

"Students whose teachers used the new curriculum and participated in PD had statistically greater achievement than those students whose teachers used the new curriculum with no PD. Even more significant, achievement for students of those teachers who continued to use the older standard curriculum was greater than that of those students whose teachers used the new curriculum with no PD."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pd-models-and-curriculum-support
title All 35 reviewed studies used models or modeling, and curriculum without PD support yielded worse outcomes than older curriculum with none
description All 35 reviewed studies used models or modeling, and curriculum without PD support yielded worse outcomes than older curriculum with none
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — darling-hammond-2017, darling-hammond-2017-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.