Claims

The review finds that pedagogical innovations in digital environments improved motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills in higher education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Studies included in the review reported improvements in motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills from pedagogical innovation in digital environments. → Casimiro Urcos CN 2026

Evidence

Casimiro Urcos CN 2026

Casimiro Urcos CN, Casimiro Urcos WH, Alberca Pintado NE, Ostos Miraval RM, Carrasco Muñoz MA, Piñas Rivera LC. (2026). Pedagogical Innovation in Digital Environments: A Systematic Review Focused on Higher Education. F1000Research 15:522. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.176682.1

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's thematic synthesis of 39 included studies (total 9927 participants) reported "improvements in motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills". No pooled effect sizes were printed, so magnitude is not stated.

"Improvements were reported in motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills, although gaps in connectivity, teacher training, and institutional sustainability persisted."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.