Claims

Peer assessment is equivalent to teacher assessment for exact-science exams with clear marking schemes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teacher and peer marks did not differ significantly (t-tests, H0 accepted at 5%) and correlated highly (Pearson 0.88-0.91) across two exams. → Bouzidi 2009

Evidence

Bouzidi 2009

Bouzidi, L., & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted?. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 257-268. https://www.ifets.info/

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Comparison of teacher marks (TM) with peer marks (PM) and peer-plus-self marks (SPM) on the CA-2006 exam (68 papers) and CA-2007 exam without Q7 (94 papers); all four t-tests accepted H0 at the 5% level, with Pearson correlations of "0.88 0.91 0.89 0.91" and Cohen's d of 0.11, 0.11, 0.03, 0.06 as printed in Table 5.

"The correlation coefficients between the teacher's marks and those of the peers are high (0.90±2). The “T-Test”, applied to the marks awarded by the teacher and the marks awarded by peers, is positive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id peer-assessment-valid-exact-science-exams
title Peer assessment is equivalent to teacher assessment for exact-science exams with clear marking schemes
description Peer assessment is equivalent to teacher assessment for exact-science exams with clear marking schemes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bouzidi-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.