Claims

Combining peer assessment with self-assessment brings marks closer to the teacher's marks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Peer marks incorporating self-assessment (SPM) were the closest to teacher marks in the CA-2006 exam, and the authors conclude the combination gives better validity. → Bouzidi 2009

Evidence

Bouzidi 2009

Bouzidi, L., & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted?. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 257-268. https://www.ifets.info/

q2 · i? · design · r2

Item analysis of the CA-2006 exam (17 items, 69 exam sheets): the TM-SPM mean difference (0.12) was smaller than the TM-PM difference (0.39), and the article states "the peer assessment incorporating the self-assessment that is the closest to the assessment by the teacher".

"We also note that it is the peer assessment incorporating the self-assessment that is the closest to the assessment by the teacher."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id peer-plus-self-assessment-closer-to-teacher
title Combining peer assessment with self-assessment brings marks closer to the teacher's marks
description Combining peer assessment with self-assessment brings marks closer to the teacher's marks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bouzidi-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.