Written assignments are the most used object of peer assessment, and beliefs and perceptions are the most investigated outcome¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Almost half of the reviewed studies assessed a written assignment (45.76%), and the most commonly studied outcome was beliefs and perceptions (n = 275; 38.46%), followed by performance and skills (n = 154; 21.54%) and content of peer feedback (n = 126; 17.62%). → Alqassab 2023

Evidence¶

Alqassab 2023¶

Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Panadero, E., Fernández Ruiz, J., Warrens, M., & To, J. (2023). A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09723-7

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Frequency analysis of assessment objects (Table 6) across the reviewed studies. A second outcome analysis (Table 7) reports beliefs and perceptions (n = 275; 38.46%) as most studied, with reliability (7.69%) and processing of peer feedback (3.22%) least studied.

"Almost half of the studies used a written assignment (45.76%). The least used object of assessment was test performance (0.89%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI and peer feedback differed in complementary ways: AI gave general, rubric-driven, actionable feedback while peers gave more specific, contextual feedback — related
• Gender and ability/skills are the most investigated moderators/mediators of peer assessment — related
• Assignment support was the highest-rated Class Companion function (83% Effective/Very Effective, M = 3.38), while assessing knowledge and skills was the lowest (71%) — related