Students were far more likely to accept peer-written alternative endings as valid conclusions to the novel than ChatGPT-generated endings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? On Q12, a substantial majority of the control group (72.73%) accepted the alternative ending as valid, versus only 33.33% of the experimental group evaluating ChatGPT-generated endings. → Andrea Roxana Bellot 2025
Evidence¶
Andrea Roxana Bellot 2025¶
Andrea Roxana Bellot, Mar Gutiérrez-Colón Plana, Katarzyna Agnieszka Baran. (2025). Redefining Literature Education: The Role of ChatGPT in Undergraduate Courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00497-3
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Questionnaire item Q12 in the post-activity survey compared acceptance of the alternative ending between students who analyzed peer-written endings (control) and students who analyzed ChatGPT-generated endings (experimental). Percentages reported descriptively in Table 2 with no statistical test.
"A substantial majority of the control group (72.73%) accepted the new version as a valid ending, contrasting sharply with only 33.33% in the experimental group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students analyzing ChatGPT-generated endings were somewhat more likely than peer-text readers to believe the ending could be Orwell's original — related
- Students trusted the plot plausibility of peer-written alternative endings more than ChatGPT-generated endings — related
- Reviewed literature reports risks of overreliance, AI errors in complex tasks, and students' uncritical acceptance of AI-generated outputs — a broader claim this one bears on
- Both writing-based and AI-based alternative-ending activities motivated students, though with distinct concerns in each group — related
- Students rated ChatGPT-generated narrative endings equal to or higher than student-written endings on setting, themes, clarity of language and tone — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.