Peer feedback exposed rigidity and techno-centricity in early storyboard designs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? When storyboards were shared with peers, feedback revealed that the interface design embodied learning scenarios rigidly and lacked flexibility, prompting a return to abstraction. → Jones 2008

Evidence¶

Jones 2008¶

Jones, I. (2008). Storyboarding: A method for bootstrapping the design of computer-based educational tasks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.002

q1 · i? · design · r2

Qualitative reflection on the evolutionary development of the task: problems "became apparent when the storyboards were shared with peers", exposing rigidity arising from technological attempts to assist learners with translating natural language into formal notation.

"These problems became apparent when the storyboards were shared with peers and presented at seminars. The interface design embodied the anticipated learning scenarios in a rather rigid manner and so lacked the flexibility to accommodate much variation."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Switching from strategy building to puzzle solving overcame the implementation impasse — related
• Children are capable of more complex graphical interaction than most current software permits — related
• Language becomes an operational medium in AI-supported design, with risks of narrowing exploration — related