Service-learning students with a SLAM peer mentor scored higher on posttest civic action than non-mentored students, in a non-randomised comparison¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students with a SLAM peer mentor had significantly higher posttest civic action scores (M = 4.20, SD = .52) than students without mentoring support (M = 3.93, SD = .62), F(1) = 4.51, p = .037. → Harkins 2020
Evidence¶
Harkins 2020¶
Harkins, D. A., Grenier, L. I., Irizarry, C., Robinson, E., Ray, S., & Shea, L.-M. (2020). Building relationships for critical service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.202
q2 · quasi-experimental comparison of course groups formed by course structure, not randomised · i? · F and group means printed, no effect size · associational · r2
A MANOVA compared posttest CASQ scores between mentored (n = 60) and non-mentored (n = 65) service-learning groups after confirming no pretest differences. The article reports "a significant difference for civic action, F(1) = 4.51, p = .037" favoring the mentored group. Groups were set by which courses had a SLAM, not by random assignment, so the difference is an association the design cannot attribute to mentoring alone.
"we examined posttest scores and found a significant difference for civic action, F(1) = 4.51, p = .037, such that students with a SLAM had higher posttest civic action scores (M = 4.20, SD = .52) than students who received no mentoring support (M = 3.93, SD = .62)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Civic Mindedness — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Peer mentoring shows a trend toward higher posttest social justice attitudes — related
- Positive SLAM-student relationship qualities correlate with civic action — related
- Positive relationships with professors, community partners, and peer mentors are associated with increased intention to be civically engaged — a broader claim this one bears on
- Conflict and antagonism with community partners negatively correlate with social justice and diversity attitudes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
peer-mentoring-increases-civic-action-service-learning |
title |
Service-learning students with a SLAM peer mentor scored higher on posttest civic action than non-mentored students, in a non-randomised comparison |
description |
Service-learning students with a SLAM peer mentor scored higher on posttest civic action than non-mentored students, in a non-randomised comparison |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — harkins-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.