Claims

Positive relationships with professors, community partners, and peer mentors are associated with increased intention to be civically engaged

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Service-learners who felt positively about relationships with professors, community partners, and peer mentors reported more intention to be civically engaged in the future, including plans to volunteer and participate in community action. → Harkins 2020

Evidence

Harkins 2020

Harkins, D. A., Grenier, L. I., Irizarry, C., Robinson, E., Ray, S., & Shea, L.-M. (2020). Building relationships for critical service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.202

q3 · i? · associational · r1

The discussion section synthesizes survey and focus group findings, reporting that students described a shift in understanding their own goals and interests. One student noted gaining insight into researching educational inequities; another expressed commitment to continuing service.

"service-learners who felt positively about their relationships with their professors, community partners, and peer mentors reported more intention to be civically engaged in the future, including plans to engage in more volunteer work, to participate in community action programs and services"

Studies bearing on this claim

How much do relationships with mentors, professors and community partners matter? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 6 narrower claims that bear on it: 3 distinct studies (1 associational, 1 qualitative, 1 design), q1–q3, 1 of 3 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Harkins 2020 q2 / q3 · associational · r1 i?; i1; i3 · r = −.38 and −.41 with social justice attitudes (i3 under r bins), r = −.36 with diversity attitudes (i2) this claim; Service-learning students with a SLAM peer mentor scored higher on posttest civic action t (supports); Positive SLAM-student relationship qualities correlate with civic action (supports); Professor-student relationship quality correlates with multiple civic engagement outcomes (supports); Conflict and antagonism with community partners negatively correlate with social justice a (qualifies)
Warren-Gordon 2019 q1 · qualitative · r2 i? Community partners report that co-planning under the CSL model gives them a voice in what (qualifies)
Addison 2025 q1 · design · r2 i? Developing and delivering an integrated CBL/CEL/COIL planetary health course yielded three (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id positive-relationships-increase-civic-engagement-intention
title Positive relationships with professors, community partners, and peer mentors are associated with increased intention to be civically engaged
description Positive relationships with professors, community partners, and peer mentors are associated with increased intention to be civically engaged
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — harkins-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.