The study's analysis plan was preregistered on OSF before data examination, with no changes to the primary confirmatory analysis¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The analysis plan was registered prior to examination of the data or observing the outcomes, and no changes were made to the preregistered plan for the primary confirmatory analysis. → Krstić 2025

Evidence¶

Krstić 2025¶

Krstić, K., Nikitović, T., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., Jolić Marjanović, Z., Jošić, S., Mojović, K., Baucal, A. (2025). An Evidence-Based Framework for Training Students' Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills: Introducing and Testing the PEER Model. https://osf.io/rstwe/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The article's Open Practices Disclosure form reports that the analysis plan was "registered prior to examination of the data or observing the outcomes" and answers Yes. The form also states there were no changes to the preregistered plan for the primary confirmatory analysis and that all registered analyses are reported.

"2. Was the analysis plan registered prior to examination of the data or observing the outcomes? If no, explain.** Yes"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The Social Perspective Taking professional development study was preregistered with its confirmatory analysis plan registered before data examination and unchanged thereafter — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)