Claims

Peer tutoring produced significantly higher overall biology posttest achievement than lecture demonstration at secondary level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental (peer tutoring) group's mean posttest score was significantly greater than the control (lecture demonstration) group's. → Irfan Ullah 2018

Evidence

Irfan Ullah 2018

Irfan Ullah, Rabia Tabassum and Muhammad Kaleem. (2018). Effects of Peer Tutoring on the Academic Achievement of Students in the Subject of Biology at Secondary Level. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030112

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Posttest-Only Equivalent Group experiment with 40 male 10th-grade students at ANSI Mardan, seven weeks of peer tutoring versus lecture demonstration; independent-sample t-test gave t = 4.21 > 2.042 at 0.05, so "the mean score (36.05) of the experimental group was significantly greater".

"Thus, the mean score (36.05) of the experimental group was significantly greater than the mean score (27.25) of the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.