Peer tutoring significantly improved achievement at the knowledge level of the cognitive domain¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on knowledge-level posttest items. → Irfan Ullah 2018
Evidence¶
Irfan Ullah 2018¶
Irfan Ullah, Rabia Tabassum and Muhammad Kaleem. (2018). Effects of Peer Tutoring on the Academic Achievement of Students in the Subject of Biology at Secondary Level. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030112
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Knowledge-level subscale of the 32-item posttest in the same equivalent-group experiment (n = 20 per group); t = 3.83 exceeded the 0.05 table value, rejecting the null hypothesis for the knowledge level of the cognitive domain.
"The mean (20.6) of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (15.5) on the posttest. The difference between t-value 3.83 > 2.04 and table value at 0.05 level was significant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Peer tutoring significantly improved achievement at the application level of the cognitive domain — related
- Peer tutoring produced significantly higher overall biology posttest achievement than lecture demonstration at secondary level — a broader claim this one bears on
- Peer tutoring significantly improved achievement at the comprehension level of the cognitive domain — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.