Claims

Family engagement with the intervention resources declined over the 12 weeks and most families diverged from the suggested sequence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Resources were frequently accessed throughout the study and children were typically exposed to all target skills, but the majority of families diverged from the suggested sequence and overall use steadily declined. → Silander 2016

Evidence

Silander 2016

Silander, M., Moorthy, S., Dominguez, X., Pasnik, S., & Llorente, C. (2016). Using Digital Media at Home to Promote Young Children's Mathematics Learning: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. SREE Spring 2016 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567485

q2 · i? · causal · r2

System log data from Google analytics and a tablet app tracker for 100 PBS KIDS families, plus weekly media diaries from 201 families, tracked engagement across the 12-week period; Figure 1 plots weekly sequence completion for the 100 PBS KIDS families.

"However, the majority of families diverged from the suggested sequence, and overall use of the resources steadily declined over the course of the study (see Figure 1)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.