Claims

Poem-enhanced instruction produced higher posttest interest than game-enhanced and modified lecture instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students exposed to the poem-enhanced instructional strategy scored significantly higher on posttest interest than students exposed to the game-enhanced strategy and the modified lecture strategy. → Frederick-Jonah 2015

Evidence

Frederick-Jonah 2015

Frederick-Jonah, T. M. & Igbojinwaekwu, P. C. (2015). Effectiveness of Game and Poem Enhanced Instructional Strategies and Verbal Ability on Students’ Interest in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Research in Education, 25(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098014

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Scheffe post-hoc comparisons following the ANCOVA on estimated marginal means: PEIS mean 15.084, GEIS 14.661, MLIS 10.607. The article reports PEIS "performed significantly better" than GEIS and better than MLIS; no effect size is printed for the pairwise contrasts.

"Table 3 shows that students exposed to PEIS performed significantly better with a mean score of 15.084 than students exposed to GEIS with a mean score of 14.661. Also, students exposed PEIS are better than those exposed to MLIS with a mean score OF 10.607."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.