Claims

Instructional strategy has a significant main effect on primary students’ posttest interest in mathematics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Treatment had a significant main effect on students’ interest in mathematics, with a large printed effect size (partial eta squared = 0.665). → Frederick-Jonah 2015

Evidence

Frederick-Jonah 2015

Frederick-Jonah, T. M. & Igbojinwaekwu, P. C. (2015). Effectiveness of Game and Poem Enhanced Instructional Strategies and Verbal Ability on Students’ Interest in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Research in Education, 25(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098014

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

ANCOVA on posttest interest scores of 344 primary 6 students in a pretest-posttest, control group, quasi-experimental design, with pretest scores as covariates. The article reports the main effect was "significant" with "partial eta squared = O.665".

"Table 1 shows that the main effect is significant on students’ interest in mathematics (F (2,340) = 336.835; p < 0.05; partial eta squared = O.665).The effect size of 66.5% is fair."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.