Claims

Students reported positive views of the mobile formative assessment model, citing motivation and exam preparation benefits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-study questionnaire responses indicated an overall positive outlook on the MALL model, though some students found weekly tests and post-test activities challenging. → Titova 2015

Evidence

Titova 2015

Titova, S. (2015). Use of mobile testing system PeLe for developing language skills. Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000387

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-intervention Google questionnaire with 11 four-level Likert-scale questions, completed by 28 students of the experimental groups in January 2014, gathered to help explain the quantitative findings; responses showed an "overall positive outlook regarding the MALL model". No effect sizes are reported.

"Student answers in the post-study Google questionnaire indicated that they had an overall positive outlook regarding the MALL model. Some participants commented on the challenging nature of weekly tests and post-test activities"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.