Most students taught with detailed analogies evaluated the technique positively, though some misinterpreted analogies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 90.68% of experimental-group students (n=39) found detailed analogies very good, while a minority reported misinterpreting some analogies. → Dincer 2011

Evidence¶

Dincer 2011¶

Dincer, S. (2011). Exploring the Impacts of Analogies on Computer Hardware. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ932231

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Questionnaire given to the experimental group after the post-test assessing opinions on the analogy technique. The article reports "90.68 % of the students (n=39) found it very good" and notes that average-scoring students reported misinterpretations leading to conceptual misunderstandings.

"90.68 % of the students (n=39) found it very good; 2.33% of them (n=1) found it good; 6.99% of the students (n=3) found this technique fair average."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students responded positively to ASR pronunciation training and the Rainbow passage, but were mixed on technical aspects of recording and voice typing — related
• Experimental-group students taught with the hybrid CFC-analogy-template approach scored significantly higher than control-group students on the overall posttest (ProKT) — related
• Students reported positive views of the mobile formative assessment model, citing motivation and exam preparation benefits — related