Claims

Physicians engage in SDL programs more when they perceive the content as useful and relevant to their clinical practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Perception of SDL program content was the factor most often reported in the beliefs about consequences domain, both as facilitator (perceived usefulness/relevance) and barrier (perceived irrelevance). → Dahn J 2018

Evidence

Dahn J 2018

Dahn J, Presseau J, ElChamaa R, Naumann DN, Mascaro C, Luconi F, Smith KM, Kitto S. (2018). Barriers and Facilitators to Self-Directed Learning in Continuing Professional Development for Physicians in Canada: A Scoping Review. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002237

q3 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis attributing this pattern to cited source studies (refs 22–26, 32); the review also reports that SDL activities demonstrating improved medical practice encouraged physician engagement.

"Physicians were more favorable toward the SDL program if they perceived the content to be useful and relevant to their clinical practice,22,26,32 but they were less likely to engage in the SDL program if they judged the content to be irrelevant to them.23,25"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.