Claims

Students were more engaged in SDL when it was an assessed activity with anticipated outcomes and relevance to their future profession

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students were more engaged in SDL if it was an assessed activity, they could anticipate the expected outcomes, and it was relevant to their future profession. → Ashleigh Finn 2025

Evidence

Ashleigh Finn 2025

Ashleigh Finn, Caitlin Fitzgibbon, Natalie Fonda, Cameron M Gosling. (2025). Self-directed learning and the student learning experience in undergraduate clinical science programs: a scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10383-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review synthesises findings across included studies and reports that "students were more engaged in SDL if it was an assessed activity, they could anticipate the expected outcomes... and it was relevant to their future profession".

"students were more engaged in SDL if it was an assessed activity, they could anticipate the expected outcomes, (Berkhout et al., 2015; Embo & Valcke, 2019; Frambach et al., 2012; Leatemia et al., 2016) and it was relevant to their future profession"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.