The reduction in perceived difficulty does not mediate the benefits of rubrics on self-assessment accuracy¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Bootstrap mediation analyses found no significant indirect effect of rubric via perceived difficulty on absolute accuracy or bias. → Rebecca Krebs 2022

Evidence¶

Rebecca Krebs 2022¶

Rebecca Krebs, Björn Rothstein, Julian Roelle. (2022). Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory mediation analyses with 95% percentile bootstrap confidence intervals from 10,000 bootstrap samples (SPSS PROCESS). "zero was included in the confidence intervals" for both outcomes.

"Neither in terms of the effect on absolute accuracy, nor in terms of the effect on bias, did we find a statistically significant indirect effect via perceived difficulty (i.e., zero was included in the confidence intervals)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Exploratory tests found no significant interaction between receiving a rubric and learners' task performance on self-assessment accuracy or cognitive load — related
• The benefits of rubrics on self-assessment accuracy do not depend on the inferential level of the assessment criteria — related
• Providing a rubric during self-assessment improves the absolute accuracy of high school students' self-assessments of written scientific abstracts — related
• Perceived thought validity mediates the effect of the confidence induction on performance — related
• Providing a rubric reduces bias in self-assessment, moving judgments closer to expert ratings — related