Claims

Students' performance improved from day 1 to day 2 of the TapaCarp activity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the classroom study, the performance of the students improved from day 1 to day 2. → Cuendet 2015

Evidence

Cuendet 2015

Cuendet, S., Dehler Zufferey, J., Ortoleva, G., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). An integrated way of using a tangible user interface in a classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9213-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

Classroom study with 3 classes of carpenter apprentices over two days per class. The article reports that "the performance of the students improved from day 1 to day 2"; no effect size or test statistic is printed for this improvement.

"the performance of the students improved from day 1 to day 2, but the learning gain measured with a pre-test/post-test mechanism did not show any significant difference compared to that of a control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id performance-improved-day1-to-day2-tapacarp
title Students' performance improved from day 1 to day 2 of the TapaCarp activity
description Students' performance improved from day 1 to day 2 of the TapaCarp activity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — cuendet-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.