Children's test performance is stable over six months but monitoring and control accuracy shows little inter-individual stability¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Performance stability (Pearson correlations between T1 and T2) was significant for both grades and formats. → Steiner 2020
q3 i? Stability of monitoring and control accuracy was not significant for most comparisons, with only one low but significant correlation. → Steiner 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Steiner 2020¶
Steiner, M., van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2020). Development of Children's monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09208-5
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Pearson correlations between T1 and T2 performance (Table 2): open-ended r = .50** (2nd grade) and .62** (4th grade); true-false r = .32** and .23*. Open-ended performance stability was significantly higher than true-false stability in both grades.
"Performance for open-ended and true-false questions was stable for second and fourth graders. Stability of performance for open-ended questions was significantly higher than for true-false questions, for second graders (Fisher's z = 1.788, p = 0.04) as well as fourth graders (Fisher 's z =4 . 3 9 ;p <. 0 0 1 )"
Steiner 2020 (2)¶
Steiner, M., van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2020). Development of Children's monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09208-5
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Pearson correlations for monitoring accuracy (gamma) and control accuracy (phi) between T1 and T2 (Table 2). Most correlations were near zero and non-significant; only fourth graders' true-false monitoring accuracy showed low but significant stability (r = .17*).
"For open-ended questions, stability both for second and fourth graders was not significant ( ps ≥ .87). For true-false questions, stability was not significant for second graders (p = .99), whereas for fourth graders, stability over time was low but significant, ( p <. 0 5 )"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Children of both age groups improved monitoring and control accuracy from T1 to T2 for both test formats, mainly for incorrect rather than correct answers — reports the opposite
- Children's text comprehension test performance improved from T1 to T2, driven mainly by second graders, with fewer omission errors over time — reports the opposite
- Children became significantly less overconfident from kindergarten to 2nd grade but remained overconfident at both time points — reports the opposite
- Elementary school children monitor and control their answers to open-ended text comprehension questions more accurately than answers to true-false questions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
performance-stable-metacognitive-accuracy-unstable |
title |
Children's test performance is stable over six months but monitoring and control accuracy shows little inter-individual stability |
description |
Children's test performance is stable over six months but monitoring and control accuracy shows little inter-individual stability |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — steiner-2020, steiner-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.