Claims

Coaches reported that pupils engaged well with the variety of coaching sessions and found both one-to-one and small group work beneficial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Observations and interviews suggested pupils generally engaged well with the variety of coaching sessions and found all types of sessions beneficial. → Lord 2015

Evidence

Lord 2015

Lord, P., Bradshaw, S., Stevens, E. and Styles, B. (2015). Perry Beeches Coaching Programme: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581144

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Qualitative process evaluation finding from session observations and coach interviews in the four trial schools. The report notes it was not possible to identify the precise contribution of one-to-one sessions due to limitations in coach log data.

"Observations and interviews with coaching staff suggested that pupils generally engaged well with the variety of coaching sessions, and that they found all types of sessions beneficial."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.