Claims

Observations suggested pupils were engaged by and enjoyed the summer school, with the interactive poetry approach appearing to motivate writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Non-participant observations of two sessions indicated children were mostly well engaged and enjoyed the sessions, with the interactive approach in poetry sessions appearing to motivate pupils in their writing. → Torgerson 2014

Evidence

Torgerson 2014

Torgerson, D., Torgerson, C., Jefferson, L., Buckley, H., Ainsworth, H., Heaps, C., & Mitchell, N. (2014). Discover Summer School Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581103

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Process evaluation based on non-participant observations of two sessions (one poet-led, one teacher-led), undertaken by a researcher independent of delivery. The article states formal qualitative analysis of these observations was not conducted, so these are observational impressions rather than tested outcomes.

"Children for the most part appeared well engaged and to enjoy these sessions. The interactive approach in poetry sessions in particular appeared to motivate pupils in their writing."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.