Claims

Students in computer-based inquiry environments still held misconceptions about force and energy after instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-unit interviews with 30 experimental-group students revealed misconceptions about force, mass and weight, potential energy, and kinetic energy. → Hasan Ozgur Kapici 2025

Evidence

Hasan Ozgur Kapici 2025

Hasan Ozgur Kapici. (2025). Does inquiry-based learning work better in regular classrooms or computer-based settings? Instructional Science (2025) 53:705–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09711-0

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative content analysis of one-on-one interviews with 30 students (five per experimental class, selected across achievement levels) re-asking conceptual test questions. Misconceptions concerned "mass and weight, potential and kinetic energy, and force", e.g. a student claiming "there is no gravity on the moon".

"The results of the interviews revealed that students still have misconceptions even at the end of the computer-based IBL approach implementation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id persistent-misconceptions-computer-based-ibl
title Students in computer-based inquiry environments still held misconceptions about force and energy after instruction
description Students in computer-based inquiry environments still held misconceptions about force and energy after instruction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hasan-ozgur-kapici-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.