Across confirmatory analyses, motivation depended on fewer user characteristics under personalization, and subject and usage interval did not moderate its effect¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The assessment's subject and usage interval did not moderate personalization's effect on any motivational construct, unlike gender, education, preferred game genre and playing setting, and performance. → Rodrigues Luiz 2023

Evidence¶

Rodrigues Luiz 2023¶

Rodrigues Luiz, Palomino Paula T., Toda Armando M., Klock Ana C. T., Pessoa Marcela, Pereira Filipe D., Oliveira Elaine H. T., Oliveira David F., Cristea Alexandra I., Gasparini Isabela, Isotani Seiji. (2023). How Personalization Affects Motivation in Gamified Review Assessments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00326-x

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory moderator analyses (90% bootstrap CIs) across contextual moderators — four assessment subjects and usage intervals of 0, 4, or 6 weeks — plus user characteristics. The article concludes "did not moderate personalization's effect on any construct" for subject and interval, while listing the moderators that did; the abstract adds that motivation depended on fewer user characteristics under personalization.

"Overall, our findings indicate the assessment’s subject and usage interval did not moderate personalization’s effect on any construct, in contrast to gender, education, preferred game genre and playing setting, performance, and age (RQ1)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Preferred game genre (adventure) and preferred playing setting (singleplayer) moderated personalization's effect, in both cases in favor of OSFA — related
• Personalization's motivational effect was positive for females, with no such difference among males — related