Mean retention scores were highest for PF, followed by PM and least for PC, in both urban and rural locations¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? On the retention test administered two weeks after the experiment, mean retention was highest for PF, followed by PM and least for PC, for both urban and rural subjects. → Jacobson Barineka Nbina & Obomanu 2011
Evidence¶
Jacobson Barineka Nbina & Obomanu 2011¶
Jacobson Barineka Nbina & Obomanu, B. Joseph. (2011). Assessment of the Effects of Problem Solving Instructional Strategies On Students' Achievement and Retention in Chemistry With Respect to Location in Rivers State. World Journal of Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p74
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive analysis of Chemistry Retention Test scores (Table 3) for the 428-student quasi-experiment; retention was tested two weeks after the experiment. Table 3 shows urban means of 65.35 (PF), 54.72 (PM) and 48.19 (PC), with similar rural means. The strategy main effect in Table 4 is significant (F = 66.246).
"The data reveal that the mean retention score was highest for the PF strategy, followed by the PM and least with the PC for both urban and rural locating."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- School location shows no significant difference in chemistry retention scores — related
- Problem solving strategy type significantly affects chemistry achievement, with a hierarchical order of PF, PM and PC — related
- The strategy-by-location interaction is not significant for retention, indicating similar retention across strategies in both locations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.