Claims

A polygenic-score study of learning over 100 days of practice in 131 adults was too small to draw meaningful conclusions about genetic effects on baseline performance and learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The COGITO-based study by Youn et al. used 9 cognitive tests in 131 adults with DNA samples, but the sample was too small to draw meaningful conclusions about genetic effects on learning. → Peter M. Visscher 2022

Evidence

Peter M. Visscher 2022

Peter M. Visscher. (2022). Genetics of cognitive performance, education and learning: from research to policy? npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00124-z

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

The commentary describes the study's novel design: adults in the COGITO study, measured at baseline and repeatedly over 100 days at individualised difficulty levels, with 9 cognitive tests in a sample of 131 adults who also had DNA samples for PGS measurement. It states the study "was too small to draw any meaningful conclusions".

"The authors used 9 cognitive tests in a sample of 131 adults from whom they also had a DNA sample and therefore could measure their PGS for educational attainment"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pgs-learning-cogito-underpowered
title A polygenic-score study of learning over 100 days of practice in 131 adults was too small to draw meaningful conclusions about genetic effects on baseline performance and learning
description A polygenic-score study of learning over 100 days of practice in 131 adults was too small to draw meaningful conclusions about genetic effects on baseline performance and learning
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — peter-m-visscher-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.