Claims

The Philipsen et al. framework of TPD components for online and blended learning is biased toward higher education settings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Applying the framework to a school context showed it is biased toward TPD for OBL in higher education, because all but one reviewed study was situated in higher education. → Abaci 2021

Evidence

Abaci 2021

Abaci, S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting school teachers' rapid engagement with online education. Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09839-5

q2 · i? · design · r1

Conclusion-section reflection from applying the framework to school-teacher support during ERT. The bias is attributed to the reviewed studies' context: the introduction notes "all but one of the reviewed studies were situated in a higher education context".

"Application of the proposed framework to our context has also shown that the framework is biased towards TPD for OBL in higher education settings due to the context of studies reviewed in the paper"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id philipsen-framework-higher-education-bias
title The Philipsen et al. framework of TPD components for online and blended learning is biased toward higher education settings
description The Philipsen et al.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — abaci-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.