The Philipsen et al. framework of TPD components for online and blended learning is biased toward higher education settings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Applying the framework to a school context showed it is biased toward TPD for OBL in higher education, because all but one reviewed study was situated in higher education. → Abaci 2021
Evidence¶
Abaci 2021¶
Abaci, S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting school teachers' rapid engagement with online education. Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09839-5
q2 · i? · design · r1
Conclusion-section reflection from applying the framework to school-teacher support during ERT. The bias is attributed to the reviewed studies' context: the introduction notes "all but one of the reviewed studies were situated in a higher education context".
"Application of the proposed framework to our context has also shown that the framework is biased towards TPD for OBL in higher education settings due to the context of studies reviewed in the paper"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The pandemic made professional learning about online and blended learning immediately relevant and highly sought after by teachers who had previously been difficult to persuade to prioritise it — related
- Short online pedagogy courses shifted university teachers’ interpretations of a learning-focused teaching video from knowledge transmission toward learning facilitation — related
- A course-in-a-box TPD initiative trained 673 faculty and produced 169 new online courses since 2019 — related
- The meta-aggregative review lacks an explicitly critical framework and under-addresses equity — related
- The COVID-19 mandated shift to digital teaching created learning and performance contexts so different that the Philipsen et al. TPD-for-OBL framework's applicability may be limited — related
- Few existing studies distinguished generalized teacher PD from teacher PD for online and blended learning — related
- Seven responses to Philipsen et al.'s study offer valuable ideas and guidelines for developing TPD for OBL in times of crisis — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
philipsen-framework-higher-education-bias |
title |
The Philipsen et al. framework of TPD components for online and blended learning is biased toward higher education settings |
description |
The Philipsen et al. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — abaci-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.