Claims

Chan et al. found physical-controller VR examination has higher ease of use and lower cognitive load than hand-tracking gestures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Chan et al.'s feasibility study, simulation models with a physical controller showed higher ease of use and lower cognitive load than hand-tracking gestures limited to pinching. → Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Evidence

Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Dutt Deepaysh DCS, Hohnen Harry, Kulshrestha Subham, Razavi Hessom. (2025). Simulation models in direct ophthalmoscopy education: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79989

q2 · i? · review · r3

Feasibility study of 10 non-medical students reviewed within the systematic review, comparing HTC Vive, Valve Index and Microsoft HoloLens interaction methods. Appendix A reports that "Simulation models with a physical controller allows has a higher ease of use and lower cognitive load than hand tracking gestures (limited to pinching)."

"Chan et al.61 compared the use of the HTC Vive controller-based examination, Valve Index “Knuckle” controller-based examination, Microsoft HoloLens gesture-based examination, and noted that participants found it difficult to familiarise with operation of the three different simulations, and that headsets were heavy, and voice commands were inaccurate."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.