Claims

Plastic cannister designs are the most common direct ophthalmoscopy simulation model in the literature

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Plastic cannister models were the most common type of simulator used (n = 8, 22%), followed by ball-with-painted-fundus and EyeSi designs. → Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Evidence

Dutt Deepaysh DCS 2025

Dutt Deepaysh DCS, Hohnen Harry, Kulshrestha Subham, Razavi Hessom. (2025). Simulation models in direct ophthalmoscopy education: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79989

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of simulator types across 37 included studies. The review reports that "Plastic cannister models were the most common type of simulator used (n = 8, 22%)."

"Plastic cannister models were the most common type of simulator used (n = 8, 22%). The basic design of this involves a cylindrical cannister with an aperture on one end, with fundus slides on the other end."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.