Student surveys show widespread weekly AI use, requests for instructor guidance, and a substantial minority using AI to produce entire solutions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? An institutional survey found 80% of students using AI weekly and seeking instructor guidance. → Perl-Nussbaum 2026
q2 i? In physics-specific surveys, 29% of students reported sometimes or often using AI to produce an entire solution, and 71% of introductory students reported sometimes, often, or almost always using AI to check solution correctness before submitting. → Perl-Nussbaum 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Perl-Nussbaum 2026¶
Perl-Nussbaum, D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2026). A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23887 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.23887
q2 · i? · design · r2
Campus-wide survey at the authors' institution (Center for Teaching & Learning, 2025), cited as local motivation. It found "80% of students were using AI weekly" and that students were seeking guidance from instructors. Percentages are descriptive; no effect sizes reported.
"A survey at our institution revealed 80% of students were using AI weekly, and were seeking guidance from their instructors"
Perl-Nussbaum 2026 (2)¶
Perl-Nussbaum, D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2026). A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23887. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.23887
q2 · i? · design · r2
Physics-specific survey administered in PHYS 1110 (General Physics 1) and later in five courses reaching N~350 students. The article reports "29% of students reported sometimes or often using AI to produce an entire solution" and that 71% of introductory students use AI to check correctness. Descriptive percentages only.
"29% of students reported sometimes or often using AI to produce an entire solution"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student surveys show widespread AI use, desire for instructor guidance, and 'checking correctness' as a frequent use — a broader claim this one bears on
- Layer 1 survey (N=54) found mostly daily or weekly but largely passive AI use, with persistent ethical anxiety described as cheating fears or hallucination worries — related
- A majority of surveyed students want institutional training on professional and ethical AI tool use — related
- A 2024 global survey found 86% of students use AI tools while 80% report institutional policies are unclear or inadequate — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
physics-student-ai-use-survey-findings |
title |
Student surveys show widespread weekly AI use, requests for instructor guidance, and a substantial minority using AI to produce entire solutions |
description |
Student surveys show widespread weekly AI use, requests for instructor guidance, and a substantial minority using AI to produce entire solutions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — perl-nussbaum-2026, perl-nussbaum-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.