A majority of surveyed students want institutional training on professional and ethical AI tool use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a recent Inside Higher Ed survey, 57% of respondents wanted their institutions to offer training on how to use AI tools professionally and ethically. → Zachariah 2025
Evidence¶
Zachariah 2025¶
Zachariah, I., Peters Hinton, V., Ruiz, P., Dallas, D., Liberman, B., & Karim, S. (2025). AI Literacy in Postsecondary Education. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/270
q2 · i? · review · r?
Survey result reported in the brief's student-gaps section: "57% of respondents wanted their institutions to offer training" on professional and ethical AI use. The brief prints no sample size or effect size for this survey.
"A recent Inside Higher Ed survey also revealed that 57% of respondents wanted their institutions to offer training on how to use AI tools professionally and ethically"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Institutions have expanded student access to generative AI tools faster than they have developed policies, guidance, and shared learning goals for their use — related
- College leaders identify educator unfamiliarity with GenAI, lack of training infrastructure, and institutional unpreparedness as key challenges — related
- Teachers were dissatisfied with existing professional development and wanted workshops tailored to their needs, subjects, and knowledge level — related
- Few countries have defined teacher AI competencies or national AI training programmes for teachers — related
- A GenAI-integrated professional development program produced significant pre-to-post gains in EAP educators' ethical awareness (d = 0.93) and digital andragogical competence — related
- Students rate their ethical awareness of AI higher than instructors, while instructors report stronger willingness to experiment with AI tools and higher behavioural intention — related
- Student surveys show widespread AI use, desire for instructor guidance, and 'checking correctness' as a frequent use — related
- Student surveys show widespread weekly AI use, requests for instructor guidance, and a substantial minority using AI to produce entire solutions — related
- Academic integrity, professional development, and equity concerns about AI span all surveyed units, though interpreted differently — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
students-want-ai-training-survey |
title |
A majority of surveyed students want institutional training on professional and ethical AI tool use |
description |
A majority of surveyed students want institutional training on professional and ethical AI tool use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zachariah-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.