Claims

Pictorial aids improve intermediate EFL learners' speaking proficiency compared with traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After six sessions of picture-assisted teaching, the experimental group scored significantly higher on a speaking post-test than the control group. → Afraz 2018

Evidence

Afraz 2018

Afraz, S., Taghizade, L., & Taghinezhad, A. (2018). The Usefulness of Pictorial Aids in Developing Female Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Speaking Proficiency. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.38

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test on post-test scores of 20 experimental and 20 control learners taught over six sessions; the article reports the difference as statistically significant (p=0.000), with "18.30 and.66" versus "15.05 and.34".

"the estimated mean and standard deviation of the subjects’ speaking skill in the experimental group amounted to 18.30 and.66 respectively and the estimated mean and standard deviation of subjects speaking skill in the control group amounted to 15.05 and.34"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.