Claims

The experimental group gained substantially in speaking scores from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's speaking mean rose from 14.95 at pre-test to 18.30 at post-test, a statistically significant change. → Afraz 2018

Evidence

Afraz 2018

Afraz, S., Taghizade, L., & Taghinezhad, A. (2018). The Usefulness of Pictorial Aids in Developing Female Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Speaking Proficiency. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.38

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test comparing the experimental group's pre- and post-test speaking scores over six treatment sessions; the article reports a significant level of p<.001 with means of "14.95 and 18.30".

"According to the pre-test and post-test mean values of 14.95 and 18.30 as well as a significant level of p= (.000), p<.001 (table 3), the experimental group has shown a great difference at the end of the experiment."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.