Claims

Second-grade students taught Arabic with pictorial stories significantly outperformed traditionally taught controls on an achievement test, with a large group effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Post-test achievement differed significantly due to group at α=0.05 in favor of the experimental pictorial-story group (corrected means 34.94 vs 28.24; F=322.159, p=.000, η²=.785). → Hamdan 2017

Evidence

Hamdan 2017

Ribhi Khaleel Ahmad Hamdan. (2017). The Effect of Using Pictorial Story in raising the achievement in Arabic among second Grade Students' in Irbid. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(10). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1139826

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Semi-experimental post-measure study of 100 second-graders (50 experimental, 50 control) in two Irbid schools; ANCOVA on post achievement adjusting for pre. The article reports "the diffe rences in favor of the experimental group", corrected means 34.94 vs 28.24, η²=.785 ("79%").

"There is statistically significant differences in the scores of students due to group variable at the significance level (0.05), (F) was (322.159) and at statistically significant is (0.000) and the diffe rences in favor of the experimental group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.