Claims

Repeated use of picture story books in a short time reduced student enthusiasm by the fifth meeting

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students' enthusiasm for picture story books decreased by the fifth meeting because the same material type recurred over a short duration. → Roslina 2017

Evidence

Roslina 2017

Roslina. (2017). The Effect of Picture Story Books on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.213

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Observational and interview data from the treatment meetings. Students said they liked picture story books but grew bored with frequent repetition; the article attributes this to "the frequently same types materials came in a short time duration".

"In another case, the students’ enthusiast began to decrease in the fifth meeting."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.