Claims

At the start of the school year the two groups differed significantly in three vocabulary learning strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2015: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Speaking out loudly helped the experimental group significantly more (p = .029) for learning collocations, and experimental-group students significantly more often called Italian words to mind when observing their environment (p = .011). → Unterrainer 2012 q2 i? The control group spoke significantly more often with Italian-speaking people on vacation (p = .018). → Unterrainer 2012

Evidence

Unterrainer 2012

Unterrainer, Eva Maria. (2012). Mobile Learning in Foreign Language Learning: Podcasts and Lexicon Acquisition in the Elementary Instruction of Italian. In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL: Using, Learning, Knowing, EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 22-25 August 2012, Proceedings. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574913

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Written survey on vocabulary learning strategies (adapted from Neveling, 2004, ordinal scale) administered at the beginning of the school year; differences tested with the Mann-Whitney U-test in SPSS. Only the p-values for the three contrasts are printed; no effect sizes are reported.

"Speaking out loudly helps the experimental group significantly more (p = .029) to learn collocations (e.g., lavarsi i denti);"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.