Teaching vocabulary through TMM software produced significantly higher post-test vocabulary scores than conventional instruction in Iranian intermediate EFL learners¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group taught with TMM software scored significantly higher on the post-test than the control group taught conventionally (t(59) = 2.59, p = .01). → Enayati and Gilakjani 2020
Evidence¶
Enayati and Gilakjani 2020¶
Fatemeh Enayati, & Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani. (2020). The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10560
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental control-group study: 31 experimental learners used TMM software and 30 control learners received conventional instruction for 12 sessions; independent samples t-test on post-test scores showed "a statistically significant difference" with means 42.16 vs 37.47.
"there is a statistically significant difference (t (59) = 2.59, p = .01, p < .05) in vocabulary learning measures for the experimental group ( 𝑥̅ = 42.16) , who experienced vocabulary in struction through TMM, and control group ( 𝑥̅ = 37.47)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Vocabulary — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Authentic problem-based vocabulary tasks improve immediate vocabulary recall of intermediate Iranian EFL learners compared with conventional input-based tasks — related
- PBL-taught Iranian EFL learners achieved significantly higher vocabulary recall (total post-test) than conventionally taught learners — related
- Iranian intermediate EFL learners taught reading with CALL software scored significantly higher on reading comprehension than learners taught the same texts from printed pages — related
- Spanish B1 learners taught equivocal words through joke-telling retained more vocabulary on a two-week delayed post-test than learners taught the same items conventionally — related
- PBL-taught learners showed significantly higher vocabulary retention on delayed post-tests in all modules except module 3 — related
- CAVI using Vocaboly produced significantly higher post-test vocabulary scores than teacher-led instruction for intermediate Iranian EFL learners — related
- Instruction through Telegram groups produces significantly higher intermediate EFL reading comprehension post-test scores than traditional classroom instruction — related
- Supplemental blended learning with the Memrise app produced significantly higher post-test vocabulary scores than face-to-face instruction in Iranian EFL learners — related
- Intermediate EFL learners taught vocabulary through online Wikipedia texts outperformed learners taught with printed Wikipedia handouts on a researcher-made vocabulary posttest — related
- Intermediate EFL learners using the Digital Kitchen achieved significantly higher immediate post-test vocabulary gains than learners using a printed recipe in a normal kitchen — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teaching phrasal verbs through pictures significantly improves pre-intermediate EFL learners' active application of phrasal verbs in speaking — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.