Claims

EFL students taught grammar and vocabulary with Pixton comic strips scored significantly higher on a post-test than control students taught without Pixton

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a four-month quasi-experiment with 163 Ecuadorian junior-high EFL students, the experimental group using Pixton significantly increased its post-test score (t= 3.9294, p= 0.0001) relative to the control group. → Cabrera 2018

Evidence

Cabrera 2018

Cabrera, P., Castillo, L., González, P., Quiñónez, A., & Ochoa, C. (2018). The impact of using Pixton for teaching grammar and vocabulary in the EFL Ecuadorian context. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 53-76. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170640

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control-group study in a public high school in southern Ecuador; 85 experimental students used Pixton-designed materials and 78 controls used posters, flashcards and PowerPoint. The post-test mean was 11.911 (experimental) versus 9.803 (control), with "t= 3.9294 p= 0.0001" as printed in Table 2.

"As regards the post-test administered to both group s, the results show that students in the experimental group significantly increased thei r score (t= 3.9294, p= 0.0001)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.