Claims

Self-regulated jigsaw IV produced significantly higher achievement gain scores than traditional teaching in a university EFL grammar unit

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? University EFL students taught a grammar unit with self-regulated jigsaw IV achieved significantly higher achievement gain scores than students taught with traditional methods. → Esin Özdemir 2016

Evidence

Esin Özdemir 2016

Esin Özdemir, Ali Arslan. (2016). The Effect of Self-regulated Jigsaw IV on University Students' Academic Achievements and Attitudes towards English Course. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1453

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group pre-test/post-test study with 40 university EFL prep students (n=20 per group); independent samples t-test on gain scores gave t = 6.64, p = 0.019, with experimental gain mean 26.00 versus control 14.15. The finding that "the experimental group students' achievement gain scores are significantly higher" supports the claim.

"According to Table 2, from the point of achievement gain scores; the experimental group students' achievement gain scores are significantly higher than those of control group students'."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.