Claims

The evaluation found no differential impact of PLC for pupils eligible for free school meals or with low prior attainment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Separate analyses for FSM-eligible pupils and pupils with low KS2 attainment found no evidence of differential impact; reduced sample size lowered experimental power in these models. → Cinzia Rienzo 2016

Evidence

Cinzia Rienzo 2016

Cinzia Rienzo, Heather Rolfe and David Wilkinson. (2016). Powerful Learning Conversations: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581274

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Subgroup intention-to-treat analyses of the pilot RCT for pupils eligible for free school meals and those with KS2 points below the bottom third percentile. The report notes the reduced sample size reduces experimental power in these models; no effect size is printed for the subgroups.

"The evaluation did not provide evidence of a differential impact on pupils eligible for free school meals or pupils with a low prior attainment."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.