Claims

For FSM-eligible pupils there was no evidence of positive impact on attainment or self-reported character attributes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Repeating the main analysis for FSM-eligible survey volunteers found no evidence of a positive impact on academic attainment or self-reported character attributes. → Gorard et al. 2016

Evidence

Gorard et al. 2016

Stephen Gorard, Beng Huat See, Nadia Siddiqui, Emma Smith and Patrick White. (2016). Youth Social Action Trials: Youth United — Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581107

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Subgroup analysis comparing FSM-eligible survey volunteers in treatment schools with FSM-eligible survey volunteers in control schools, using the same outcome measures as the main analysis. No positive impact was detected; attainment estimates were negative but low quality.

"For pupils eligible for free schools meals, there is no evidence that the intervention had a positive impact on academic attainment or self -reported character attributes. Again, the attainment data suggests a negative impact, but the quality of this data is too low to draw this conclusion with confidence."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.