For FSM-eligible pupils there was no evidence of positive impact on attainment or self-reported character attributes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Repeating the main analysis for FSM-eligible survey volunteers found no evidence of a positive impact on academic attainment or self-reported character attributes. → Gorard et al. 2016
Evidence¶
Gorard et al. 2016¶
Stephen Gorard, Beng Huat See, Nadia Siddiqui, Emma Smith and Patrick White. (2016). Youth Social Action Trials: Youth United — Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581107
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Subgroup analysis comparing FSM-eligible survey volunteers in treatment schools with FSM-eligible survey volunteers in control schools, using the same outcome measures as the main analysis. No positive impact was detected; attainment estimates were negative but low quality.
"For pupils eligible for free schools meals, there is no evidence that the intervention had a positive impact on academic attainment or self -reported character attributes. Again, the attainment data suggests a negative impact, but the quality of this data is too low to draw this conclusion with confidence."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Socioeconomic Status — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Among FSM-eligible pupils, music workshops showed no impact on attainment relative to the drama control — related
- Passive dissemination showed no evidence of improving literacy attainment for the subgroup of pupils who have ever been eligible for free school meals — related
- The intervention showed no evidence of differentially benefiting pupils eligible for free school meals in any of the schools — related
- The trial found a statistically significant negative literacy impact for FSM-eligible pupils, treated with caution — related
- The evaluation found no differential impact of PLC for pupils eligible for free school meals or with low prior attainment — related
- The TextNow programme showed a differential effect by free school meal eligibility: a small non-significant positive effect for FSM-eligible pupils and a significant negative effect for non-FSM pupils — related
- RLC showed no differential impact for pupils eligible for free school meals — related
- Quest showed no differential effects by gender, FSM eligibility, or prior reading attainment — related
- School-based uniformed youth group participation showed no evidence of benefit for pupils' academic attainment, with small negative but low-quality effect estimates — related
- Participation in uniformed youth groups is associated with small improvements in self-reported self-confidence and teamwork — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.