Claims

The podcast group significantly outperformed the control group on the listening comprehension post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group (mean 14.76) scored significantly higher than the control group (mean 13.62) on the listening post-test (independent-samples t-test, p = .018). → Shiri 2015

Evidence

Shiri 2015

Saeed Shiri. (2015). The Application of Podcasting as a Motivational Strategy to Iranian EFL Learners of English: A View toward Listening Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.3p.155

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test comparing post-test listening scores of the podcast group (n = 17) and control group (n = 16) in a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. The article reports "the p value of .018 is much lower than .05", a statistically significant difference; no effect size is printed.

"As shown in Table 4.3., the mean scores of the experimental and control groups are 14.76 and 13.62, respectively."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.