Claims

The zero class hour group and the traditionally taught group made statistically similar listening gains after two months

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Posttest means of the experimental group (13.43) and control group (13.22) did not differ significantly (P = 0.686), indicating similar improvement under the two teaching ways. → Wang 2010

Evidence

Wang 2010

Yushan Wang. (2010). To Give Control to Learners or Not? A Comparative Study of Two Ways of Teaching Listening. English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 2. http://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples T-test comparing posttest scores of the control group (mean 13.22, N=51) and experimental group (mean 13.43, N=51), T = 0.406, P = 0.686. The article concludes "students made the same improvement in developing their listening comprehension".

"The P value as shown in Table 4.2.2 reached 0.686, which is much high than 0.05. Thus we reach the conclusion that students made the same improvement in developing their listening comprehension."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.